DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Explorer vs 2004 Ford Sport Trac Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExplorerModelSport Trac
2005Model year2004
EstateBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
213 HPPower213 HP
339 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank0 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4810 mmLength—
1830 mmWidth—
1830 mmHeight—
1965 KgWeight—
2890 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Explorer and 2004 Ford Sport Trac approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…