DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Sport Trac vs 2005 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
Sport TracModelExplorer
2004Model year2005
—Body typeEstate
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
213 HPPower213 HP
339 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4810 mm
—Width1830 mm
—Height1830 mm
—Weight1965 Kg
—Wheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Sport Trac and 2005 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…