DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Expedition vs 1991 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExpeditionModelThunderbird
1996Model year1991
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
218 HPPower208 HP
393 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption19 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size225/50/R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5200 mmLength5088 mm
2000 mmWidth1847 mm
1900 mmHeight1333 mm
2200 KgWeight1687 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Expedition and 1991 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…