DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Expedition vs 1996 Ford Expedition Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExpeditionModelExpedition
2000Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
218 HPPower218 HP
393 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank98 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/70 R16Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5200 mmLength5200 mm
2000 mmWidth2000 mm
1900 mmHeight1900 mm
2200 KgWeight2200 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Expedition and 1996 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…