DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Thunderbird vs 1996 Ford Expedition Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ThunderbirdModelExpedition
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
208 HPPower218 HP
380 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank98 lt
19 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
13,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50/R16Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength5200 mm
1847 mmWidth2000 mm
1333 mmHeight1900 mm
1687 KgWeight2200 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Thunderbird and 1996 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…