DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Econoline vs 2005 Saab 9-7X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-7X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSaab
EconolineModel9-7X
2003Model year2005
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5327 cc
258 HPPower304 HP
474 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank83 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size255/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4922 mm
2014 mmWidth1915 mm
2050 mmHeight1791 mm
—Weight2165 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Econoline and 2005 Saab 9-7X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-7X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…