DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
ArmadaModelEconoline
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
8Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
305 HPPower258 HP
522 NmTorque474 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank132 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
15,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R18Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength5382 mm
2002 mmWidth2014 mm
1913 mmHeight2050 mm
2340 KgWeight—
3130 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…