DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-7X vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-7X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeFord
9-7XModelEconoline
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
304 HPPower258 HP
447 NmTorque474 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank132 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/55 R18Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4922 mmLength5382 mm
1915 mmWidth2014 mm
1791 mmHeight2050 mm
2165 KgWeight—
2870 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-7X and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-7X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…