DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Econoline vs 2005 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeGMC
EconolineModelYukon
2003Model year2005
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5327 cc
258 HPPower288 HP
474 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank98 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength5029 mm
2014 mmWidth2004 mm
2050 mmHeight1943 mm
—Weight2350 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Econoline and 2005 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…