DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Econoline vs 2003 Chevrolet Astro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
EconolineModelAstro
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
8Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4192 ccEngine displacement4300 cc
203 HPPower192 HP
339 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank102 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4821 mm
2014 mmWidth1969 mm
2050 mmHeight1903 mm
2370 KgWeight2025 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Econoline and 2003 Chevrolet Astro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…