2005 • Ford
F-150
Ford F-150 2005Overall Score71.5/100
2005 Ford F-150 vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Econoline
Ford Econoline 4.2 i V6 (203 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Ford F-150
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford F-150SpecificationFord Econoline
FordMakeFord
F-150ModelEconoline
2005Model year2003
—Body typeMinivan
—Seats8
—Doors4
Performance
Ford F-150SpecificationFord Econoline
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
202 HPPower203 HP
206 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford F-150SpecificationFord Econoline
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank132 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford F-150SpecificationFord Econoline
—Length5382 mm
—Width2014 mm
—Height2050 mm
—Weight2370 Kg
—Wheelbase3505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Ford F-150 and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford F-150 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Mustang vs Ford F-1502005 and 2005 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMazda B-series vs Ford F-1502004 and 2005 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableChevrolet Silverado vs Ford F-1502005 and 2005 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Ranger vs Ford F-1502004 and 2005 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Sport Trac vs Ford F-1502004 and 2005 model yearsComments are loading…