DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Explorer vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExplorerModelEconoline
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3Doors4

Performance

177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3958 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
160 HPPower203 HP
305 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank132 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4536 mmLength5382 mm
1783 mmWidth2014 mm
1714 mmHeight2050 mm
1807 KgWeight2370 Kg
2593 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Explorer and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…