DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Alpina B3 vs 2004 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeNissan
B3ModelCima
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h—
266 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3300 ccEngine displacement2988 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
335 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,8 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4471 mmLength4970 mm
1739 mmWidth1820 mm
1395 mmHeight1450 mm
1450 KgWeight1670 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Alpina B3 and 2004 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…