DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler Concorde vs 2005 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeAlpina
ConcordeModelB3
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
225 km/hTop speed266 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
258 HPPower280 HP
348 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4471 mm
1890 mmWidth1739 mm
1435 mmHeight1395 mm
1690 KgWeight1450 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler Concorde and 2005 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…