2004 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2004Overall Score81.75/100
2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2005 Alpina B3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Alpina
B3
Alpina B3 3.3 i 24V (280 Hp) 2005Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Alpina B3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlpina B3
NissanMakeAlpina
CedricModelB3
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlpina B3
—0–100 km/h5,7 s
220 km/hTop speed266 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
387 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
18 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/60 R16 HTyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAlpina B3
4860 mmLength4471 mm
1770 mmWidth1739 mm
1450 mmHeight1395 mm
1660 KgWeight1450 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Nissan Cedric and 2005 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…