DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Contour vs 1999 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ContourModelContour
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2539 ccEngine displacement2539 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
224 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 STyre size185/70 R14 S

Dimensions

4671 mmLength4671 mm
1755 mmWidth1755 mm
1384 mmHeight1384 mm
1257 KgWeight1257 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Contour and 1999 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…