DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
FreelanderModelContour
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2539 cc
177 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4671 mm
1809 mmWidth1755 mm
1709 mmHeight1384 mm
1550 KgWeight1257 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…