1999 • Ford
Cougar
Ford Cougar 2.5i V6 24V (170 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
1999 Ford Cougar vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.5i V6 24V LX (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford CougarSpecificationFord Contour
FordMakeFord
CougarModelContour
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Ford CougarSpecificationFord Contour
8,1 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2544 ccEngine displacement2539 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
220 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford CougarSpecificationFord Contour
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford CougarSpecificationFord Contour
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford CougarSpecificationFord Contour
4700 mmLength4671 mm
1770 mmWidth1755 mm
1320 mmHeight1384 mm
1390 KgWeight1257 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Cougar and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…