2000 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.5i 24V GL (165 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
2000 Ford Contour vs 2000 Nissan X-Terra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
X-Terra
Nissan X-Terra 2.4 i 16V 2WD (145 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ContourSpecificationNissan X-Terra
FordMakeNissan
ContourModelX-Terra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford ContourSpecificationNissan X-Terra
190 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
165 HPPower145 HP
217 NmTorque309 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ContourSpecificationNissan X-Terra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ContourSpecificationNissan X-Terra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14VTyre size235/70 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ContourSpecificationNissan X-Terra
4658 mmLength4522 mm
1749 mmWidth1788 mm
1374 mmHeight1763 mm
1400 KgWeight1620 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2650 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Contour and 2000 Nissan X-Terra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…