DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan X-Terra vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
X-TerraModelContour
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

165 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
145 HPPower165 HP
309 NmTorque217 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R14V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4658 mm
1788 mmWidth1749 mm
1763 mmHeight1374 mm
1620 KgWeight1400 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan X-Terra and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…