DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Contour vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.25–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ContourModelContour
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
165 HPPower165 HP
217 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14VTyre size195/65 R14V

Dimensions

4658 mmLength4658 mm
1749 mmWidth1749 mm
1374 mmHeight1374 mm
1400 KgWeight1400 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Contour and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…