E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Contour vs 1987 Ford Capri Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 23 points.

63.25–40.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford ContourSpecificationFord Capri
FordMakeFord
ContourModelCapri
2002Model year1987
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

Ford ContourSpecificationFord Capri
7,1 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2544 ccEngine displacement0 cc
197 HPPower73 HP
265 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Ford ContourSpecificationFord Capri
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford ContourSpecificationFord Capri
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/55 ZR 16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford ContourSpecificationFord Capri
4670 mmLength—
1755 mmWidth—
1385 mmHeight—
1400 KgWeight—
2710 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Contour and 1987 Ford Capri approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 23 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS2002 Ford ContourSsangYong Chairman vs Ford Contour2002 and 2002 model years2002 Renault EspaceVS2002 Ford ContourRenault Espace vs Ford Contour2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVS2002 Ford ContourVolvo XC70 vs Ford Contour2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVS2002 Ford ContourVolvo XC90 vs Ford Contour2002 and 2002 model years2002 Subaru OutbackVS2002 Ford ContourSubaru Outback vs Ford Contour2002 and 2002 model years

Comments are loading…