DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Subaru Outback vs 2002 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeFord
OutbackModelContour
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
210 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3000 ccEngine displacement2544 cc
209 HPPower197 HP
0 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
14,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17Tyre size205/55 ZR 16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4670 mm
1770 mmWidth1755 mm
1545 mmHeight1385 mm
1610 KgWeight1400 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Subaru Outback and 2002 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…