2000 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.0i 16V (132 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Ford Contour vs 2000 Toyota Previa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Previa
Toyota Previa 2.0 D (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ContourSpecificationToyota Previa
FordMakeToyota
ContourModelPrevia
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Ford ContourSpecificationToyota Previa
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
132 HPPower116 HP
174 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ContourSpecificationToyota Previa
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ContourSpecificationToyota Previa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/70 R14 VTyre size215/60 R16
Dimensions
Ford ContourSpecificationToyota Previa
4658 mmLength4750 mm
1749 mmWidth1790 mm
1374 mmHeight1820 mm
1320 KgWeight1585 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2900 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Contour and 2000 Toyota Previa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…