DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Previa vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
PreviaModelContour
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
116 HPPower132 HP
280 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size185/70 R14 V

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4658 mm
1790 mmWidth1749 mm
1820 mmHeight1374 mm
1585 KgWeight1320 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Previa and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…