DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 605 vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeFord
605ModelContour
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
141 HPPower132 HP
225 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4658 mm
1799 mmWidth1749 mm
1417 mmHeight1374 mm
1430 KgWeight1320 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 605 and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…