2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 16V (145 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Ford C-Max vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V50
FordMakeVolvo
C-MaxModelV50
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V50
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
203 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
185 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
10 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V50
4330 mmLength4522 mm
1820 mmWidth1845 mm
1600 mmHeight1457 mm
1294 KgWeight1472 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford C-Max and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…