DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Classic vs 2004 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Classic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
ClassicModelC-Max
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
180 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
141 HPPower145 HP
203 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption10 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4330 mm
1760 mmWidth1820 mm
1425 mmHeight1600 mm
1375 KgWeight1294 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Classic and 2004 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…