2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 16V (145 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationFord C-Max
VolvoMakeFord
V50ModelC-Max
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationFord C-Max
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
136 HPPower145 HP
320 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption10 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationFord C-Max
4522 mmLength4330 mm
1845 mmWidth1820 mm
1457 mmHeight1600 mm
1472 KgWeight1294 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…