2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 16V (145 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Ford C-Max vs 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mercedes-Benz
Vaneo
Mercedes-Benz Vaneo 1.9i (125 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
FordMakeMercedes-Benz
C-MaxModelVaneo
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
9,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
203 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1898 cc
145 HPPower125 HP
185 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
10 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
4330 mmLength4190 mm
1820 mmWidth1740 mm
1600 mmHeight1830 mm
1294 KgWeight1300 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2900 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford C-Max and 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…