2006 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.8 TDCi (115 Hp) 2006Overall Score65.5/100
2006 Ford C-Max vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.0 TD (112 Hp) 2006Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
FordMakeLand Rover
C-MaxModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
MPVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—0–100 km/h14,4 s
0 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
115 HPPower112 HP
280 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4333 mmLength4368 mm
1825 mmWidth1809 mm
1595-1601 mmHeight1708 mm
—Weight1565 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford C-Max and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…