2006 • Nissan
Sentra
Nissan Sentra 1.8 i 16V XE (127 Hp) 2006Overall Score66.25/100
2006 Nissan Sentra vs 2006 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.8 TDCi (115 Hp) 2006Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Sentra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan SentraSpecificationFord C-Max
NissanMakeFord
SentraModelC-Max
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan SentraSpecificationFord C-Max
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
127 HPPower115 HP
175 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan SentraSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan SentraSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan SentraSpecificationFord C-Max
4509 mmLength4333 mm
1710 mmWidth1825 mm
1410 mmHeight1595-1601 mm
1165 KgWeight—
2535 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Nissan Sentra and 2006 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Sentra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…