DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Land Rover Freelander vs 2006 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
FreelanderModelC-Max
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeMPV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h—
159 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
112 HPPower115 HP
260 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4333 mm
1809 mmWidth1825 mm
1708 mmHeight1595-1601 mm
1565 KgWeight—
2557 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Land Rover Freelander and 2006 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…