2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.8 16V (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Scenic
Renault Scenic 1.9 dTi (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Scenic
FordMakeRenault
C-MaxModelScenic
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Scenic
10,8 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
193 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
120 HPPower98 HP
165 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Scenic
4330 mmLength4425 mm
1820 mmWidth1775 mm
1600 mmHeight1720 mm
1287 KgWeight1485 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…