DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMPV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
107 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4082 mmLength4330 mm
1698 mmWidth1820 mm
1368 mmHeight1600 mm
1125 KgWeight1287 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…