DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFord
156ModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
144 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4330 mm
1745 mmWidth1820 mm
1415 mmHeight1600 mm
1230 KgWeight1287 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…