2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.8 16V (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.6i 16V (107 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Megane
FordMakeRenault
C-MaxModelMegane
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Megane
10,8 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower107 HP
165 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationRenault Megane
4330 mmLength4082 mm
1820 mmWidth1698 mm
1600 mmHeight1368 mm
1287 KgWeight1125 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2468 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…