DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Alpina B3 vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.5–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
AlpinaMakeBMW
B3ModelZ3
1996Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
6,8 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
254 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
250 HPPower231 HP
320 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/40 R17; 265/35 R17Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
4433 mmLength4050 mm
1710 mmWidth1740 mm
1328 mmHeight1306 mm
1450 KgWeight1305 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Alpina B3 and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…