DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi GTO vs 1996 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlpina
GTOModelB3
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
0 km/hTop speed254 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
417 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size235/40 R17; 265/35 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4433 mm
1840 mmWidth1710 mm
1285 mmHeight1328 mm
1710 KgWeight1450 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi GTO and 1996 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…