DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Alpina B3 vs 1996 Mitsubishi 3000 GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.5–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeMitsubishi
B3Model3000 GT
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h—
254 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
250 HPPower320 HP
320 NmTorque427 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/40 R17; 265/35 R17Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4565 mm
1710 mmWidth1840 mm
1328 mmHeight1290 mm
1450 KgWeight1725 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Alpina B3 and 1996 Mitsubishi 3000 GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…