2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Nissan Cube Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Nissan
Cube
Nissan Cube 1.5 (109Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Cube
FordMakeNissan
C-MaxModelCube
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Cube
11,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Cube
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Cube
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Cube
4330 mmLength3900 mm
1820 mmWidth1670 mm
1600 mmHeight1645 mm
1292 KgWeight1060 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Nissan Cube approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…