DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFord
Grand VitaraModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,3 s
140 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
107 HPPower109 HP
144 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4090 mmLength4330 mm
1700 mmWidth1820 mm
1690 mmHeight1600 mm
1270 KgWeight1292 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…