2003 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.5 i (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Toyota Probox vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProboxSpecificationFord C-Max
ToyotaMakeFord
ProboxModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota ProboxSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
141 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ProboxSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProboxSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ProboxSpecificationFord C-Max
4195 mmLength4330 mm
1695 mmWidth1820 mm
1525 mmHeight1600 mm
1030 KgWeight1292 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Probox and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…