2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Mazda Protege Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.5 i (110 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Protege
FordMakeMazda
C-MaxModelProtege
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Protege
11,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1489 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
240 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Protege
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Protege
4330 mmLength4315 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1600 mmHeight1410 mm
1292 KgWeight1020 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…