DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Alpina B3 vs 2012 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
AlpinaMakeJaguar
B3ModelXJ
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4,5 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
300 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
408 HPPower340 HP
540 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank82 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
245/35 ZR19; 265/35 ZR19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4668 mmLength5127 mm
1782 mmWidth1899 mm
1405 mmHeight1456 mm
1535 KgWeight1748 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase3032 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Alpina B3 and 2012 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…