DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jaguar F-type vs 2012 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlpina
F-typeModelB3
2013Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
275 km/hTop speed300 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
380 HPPower408 HP
460 NmTorque540 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R19; 275/35 R19Tyre size245/35 ZR19; 265/35 ZR19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4470 mmLength4668 mm
1923 mmWidth1782 mm
1308 mmHeight1405 mm
1604 KgWeight1535 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jaguar F-type and 2012 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…