DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Alpina B3 vs 2013 Jaguar F-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeJaguar
B3ModelF-type
2012Model year2013
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
300 km/hTop speed275 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
408 HPPower380 HP
540 NmTorque460 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/35 ZR19; 265/35 ZR19Tyre size245/40 R19; 275/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4668 mmLength4470 mm
1782 mmWidth1923 mm
1405 mmHeight1308 mm
1535 KgWeight1604 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Alpina B3 and 2013 Jaguar F-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…