2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.8 GT (182.AC) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.8 16V (122 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo S40
FiatMakeVolvo
BravoModelS40
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo S40
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1747 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
113 HPPower122 HP
154 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo S40
4025 mmLength4516 mm
1755 mmWidth1716 mm
1420 mmHeight1422 mm
1100 KgWeight1255 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2562 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…