DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
LagunaModelBravo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
202 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1783 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
120 HPPower113 HP
165 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4025 mm
1750 mmWidth1755 mm
1430 mmHeight1420 mm
1225 KgWeight1100 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…