DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeRenault
BravoModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
193 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1747 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
113 HPPower120 HP
154 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4510 mm
1755 mmWidth1750 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1100 KgWeight1225 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…